Primary tabs

Comments by User

Tuesday, November 26, 2013 - 21:38

Ideed I did forget. Thanks for pointing this out.

Thursday, October 31, 2013 - 09:16

As I said: All hammers share many similarities. However I can clearly see quite a few differences (in the shape, the texture) between the one in the link and the one I uploaded.

Wednesday, October 30, 2013 - 12:53

Can you be more specific and provide a link? Do they have only one hammer? Or every hammer out of hundreds of their concept art is protected by copyright? All basic hammers look alike and having a skull on the hammer head does not make it a replica of GW's hammers. I think it is perfectly alright to licence this model as it is. 

Friday, September 20, 2013 - 11:19

Thank you, Delirius.

Friday, September 6, 2013 - 09:54

Idk, qubodup. I am not affiliated with AT in anyway. The newly submitted archive has only my artwork.

Friday, September 6, 2013 - 09:29

Creared the GPL stuff. Evertyhing is CC0 now. I tried getting in touch with AT devs (email, irc). Forum posting requires registering. I have no desire for that.

Wednesday, September 4, 2013 - 19:54

Excellent. Like it so much. Thanks for sharing!

Tuesday, August 13, 2013 - 16:51

The *.blend model does not have a moving animaiton. But you can create one yourself, I guess. The file for the catapult is in the collection here http://opengameart.org/content/blender-models-for-freeciv-units.

Sunday, July 28, 2013 - 18:07

I am really glad you find it enjoyable, FacadeGaikar. Happy blending!

Sunday, May 26, 2013 - 15:49

Thank you, qubodup. I think your advice is great. I could also use CC-BY license, but CC0 is good too and if someone decides not to give credit I am alright with that.

Pages