Primary tabs

Comments by User

Tuesday, January 7, 2014 - 12:40

@kagerato

No longer any objection since Magdalen Kadel is the same person who made the upload on Wikimedia and here. It says Magdalen Kadel here and it says the same on Wikimedia at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Breves_dies_hominis.ogg so no longer any objection.

Tuesday, April 23, 2013 - 10:09

I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide.
In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so:
I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

doesn't equal any versions of CC0.

Friday, April 5, 2013 - 17:09

I can't tell if you're being serious either since I see no game art from you, maybe you have some art piece to show off something at least that can be useful for a game? It has already been said that my piece isn't game art so maybe you can either publish something of your own or make an ontopic comment on my art thread?

Sunday, March 31, 2013 - 16:02

I'll explain how I came to get inspired to do the Black Red ninja. The colors Black and Red were my favourite as a child, mainly because I like liquorice and there were 'candy ropes' that were Black and Red. It was my idea that really evil beings would have red and black as the ultimate colors.

The ninja was done by mistake, in fact I just wanted to play around with the colors and then I noticed they had a shape as a black-red ninja.

Sometimes great pieces of art happen by mistake. Also to prevent any confusion, my art is CC0 and all art I support or decide to fund will be CC0, cause I'm part of the permissive CC0 culture movement.

Sunday, March 31, 2013 - 15:36

Stop spamming my thread with stuff not about my art. If you are really serious and not just a newborn spammer, then cjc83486 should post the derivative work separately, not here.

Sunday, March 31, 2013 - 15:30

The problem is you're not saying what you like about the art, so you're just spamming without adding anything constructive.

It's kind of amusing and sad how oga "artists" spend their time.

Meaning spending time spamming a thread of little importance instead of doing what they like or are good at. Maybe you have decided to stop making art after getting "inspired" by my piece? :D

Sunday, March 31, 2013 - 03:54

You can give me 1 Satoshi. Do you know what that is? :D

Today one Satoshi is worth 0.00000092 USD(U.S.A. Dollars). You could give me two Satoshi if you want to be extra generous :D

Here's the address: 18HZWK6vtg59bmfeWDR6SsqpMAa3T2cKsu

Saturday, March 30, 2013 - 08:39

noway links to:

http://www.27bslash6.com/overdue.html "As I have stated, we do not accept drawings in lei of money for accounts outstanding. We accept cheque, bank cheque, money order or cash. Please make a payment this week to avoid incurring any additional fees

With Bitcoin to receive money you don't have to pay any fees. That's the design of the system.

Dear friends you have already gone offtopic so soon we will be talking about giraffes and flying elephants. Please keep the topic to my art or Bitcoins, Proof of Work or Public key Bitcoingraphy. See, you've already confused me, thx to your improper manners :D

At the very core Bitcoin is composed of Proof of work which can be expressed by checksums. Proof of work is like brute-forcing checksums until a fitting one is found. A fitting one is one where the desired checksum begins with a certain amount of zeroes.

Example

0000000000000165f69c0c7faee8e7b306539f304a764dc2419be4041bdc1d8e

That is a SHA-256 checksum. So I would say that geeks ignorant of Bitcoin is ignorant of checksums. They don't know really what they are. Still checksums are a very common technology, like in Bittorrent. Or for some geeks with MD5 checksums, though MD5 is considered not cryptographically secure.

Saturday, March 30, 2013 - 08:19

The original art is CC0 1.0 Universal and it will remain under this permissive waiver for the rest of eternity :D

Friday, March 29, 2013 - 18:31

Edit Warning: This post has been edited heavily, for TL;DR guidelines. If you want to reply to parts that you received you are welcome to. Please don't burn my art. Flames not welcome

I appreciate your attempt to play your role to the hilt

You are obviously not a fan of 'assume good faith'. If you don't like this art, then why are you commenting? Doesn't other art deserve your comments, thoughts and especially your time?

I show off my art and I've acknowledged it was a mistake uploading it here. You adding with a bad attitude doesn't help anybody, while essentially saying the same thing from post 1 though in a 'more poetic way'

Pages