License is still stange. The licence in the archive says «You may use these graphics in personal and commercial projects». Does it mean that corporate non-commercial projects are forbidden? I would strongly suggest you stick to one of the licensing options offered here.
This example is not representative of the 'most art' on OGA.
Most authors do make a attempt to provide images in a format that can be used in games. Although image dimensions and other technical details are not standartised, users can at least expect sprites to be on a transparent or solid-colour background.
> rather than you just trying to delete > anything I say that you don't like via > these internet proxies rather than you > having the will to say your piece to my face?
If you dislike Internet as a means of communication, you shouldn't have started this discussion in the Internet in the first place.
> Otherwise you'll get yourself about 9000 new > accounts, coming from feminists and other political > parties, who will just exploit your site and forum > as a free political platform, ruining any constructive > discussion about game art and open source.
> You cant say "nigger" or question > authorities without being shunned. > Today it is 95% politics and just 5% code.
"You are allowed to use racial slurs" is as much a political decision as "you are not allowed to use racial slurs". The amount of politics stays the same in both cases.
> Admins should just outright ban any politics.
Do you mean this topic should be banned outright? It’s clearly about politics.
I've just revised these tiles a bit: changed the water and the sand so that they’re not just a random noise but have some texture, and changed the grass so that it tiles better. The original version is still there if someone likes it.
License is still stange. The licence in the archive says «You may use these graphics in personal and commercial projects». Does it mean that corporate non-commercial projects are forbidden? I would strongly suggest you stick to one of the licensing options offered here.
This example is not representative of the 'most art' on OGA.
Most authors do make a attempt to provide images in a format that can be used in games. Although image dimensions and other technical details are not standartised, users can at least expect sprites to be on a transparent or solid-colour background.
> rather than you just trying to delete
> anything I say that you don't like via
> these internet proxies rather than you
> having the will to say your piece to my face?
If you dislike Internet as a means of communication, you shouldn't have started this discussion in the Internet in the first place.
I do hope this topics gets deleted.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coherence_%28linguistics%29
(By that link I want to say I don't see what the article you've linked has to do with the previous conversation.)
> Otherwise you'll get yourself about 9000 new
> accounts, coming from feminists and other political
> parties, who will just exploit your site and forum
> as a free political platform, ruining any constructive
> discussion about game art and open source.
[citation needed]
> You cant say "nigger" or question
> authorities without being shunned.
> Today it is 95% politics and just 5% code.
"You are allowed to use racial slurs" is as much a political decision as "you are not allowed to use racial slurs". The amount of politics stays the same in both cases.
> Admins should just outright ban any politics.
Do you mean this topic should be banned outright? It’s clearly about politics.
Can you please give us the full story? What kind of game it was?
I've just revised these tiles a bit: changed the water and the sand so that they’re not just a random noise but have some texture, and changed the grass so that it tiles better. The original version is still there if someone likes it.
Quite nice! I like them.
But your tags got wrong. I believe you need to separate tags with commas.
Pages