Xonotic has dual-wielding weapons, mini powerups (buffs), Quake mode, side-scrolling maps, minigames, mounting creatures, in-game radio and a whole bunch more stuff since 0.6, your mod just has a few features you've been boasting about for years.

You seem to forget you're talking to someone who is also a "do-er", but I like to focus on making my features work well as well as being enjoyable, and I don't need thousands of lines of duplicated code to do it either.

The gamemode your mod still uses is really bad, and was removed for good reasons.

Also keep in mind, we can take anything you boast to us about; I've already taken a modified version of the day-night cycles, a couple of weapons and vehicles, but they're limited to servers like Jeff's, due to the quality of their assets.

I only mentioned a few features I know would be a nightmare to port, the rest are hidden gems you'll have to dig for.

I forgot the most important feature of all...

Hats. We have hats.

He does not even care the slightest, that I tried to defend him and be neutral, since after the slightest critique he goes on a crusade against me.

Well this proofs to me that everything he receives is fully deserved.

My first critique point would be the levels, I call this method the ignorance method.

In leven design you have different main isciplines: art style, layout, item placement, playtesting.

However he ignores all four of them and just does everything randomly and of course never tests it.

I saw people designing better levels with no prior experience in level design at all.

Of course you can implement stuff faster, if there is nobody else working on it, you never test it and never bugfix it before release.

So this project is probably a good example what comes out if you always ignore feedback and overall ignore reality.

I've read through this thread and I'm completely baffled by all the posts that have become negative and nasty.

some of this doesn't make any sense so I'm sure posts have been removed by admins at some point.

i think any work put into any project and by whom should be applauded, there our many efforts made, and it's great that it shared with the community for comment, and hopefully those comments can be taken constructively, even if it's criticisms.

but we should all treat each other Respectfully, regardless of our views and opinions, Respect is key, especially in a community like OGA.we may not agree with everyone's views or whatever, but be we should respect them either way. Which sadly we seemed to have lost that somewhere in this thread and is now in my view/opinion overshadowed by nastiness and name calling.

It does not help if you treat him respectfully, if you are not always for him, he will insult you in the worst imaginary ways, try it out.

Honesty, if other users are not taking your criticism or comments kindly and are being abusive or negative towards them, then show some resolve and don't give them the satisfaction of lowering yourselves to their  level and be abusive back, just leave the post and move on. Not that I support bad comments, but should you feel it necessary to respond in a negative way then I suggest sending a private message. comments posted openly like they have been on this thread leave a bad taste in ones mouth and it doesn't portray those users in a good light, nor does it OGA, any new comers visiting the site could well be put off by reading, and I'm sure once the admins pick it up might say something about the conduct here and act occordingly.

MikeeUSA was banned for repeated violation of the forum rules. Not without warning either. Multiple warnings from several admins, in fact. His ban had nothing to do with statements of worth.

Earlier in this thread, Botanic stated: 

"...it will not be tolerated degrading other people, man, woman, child or otherwise. If I see this kind of behavor again I will be forced to ban your account..."

Disagreeing with others is fine. Being disrespectful is not. Ad Hominem attacks are not ok. Hateful slurs (obfuscated or otherwise) are not ok. Being religious or political is fine, but not here. It is explicitly disallowed on OGA. Bringing religion or politics into the discussion is not ok. 

this is not the first time I've warned MikeeUSA on this site. Heck, it's not even the 3rd time. This isn't even the first warning to people on this thread.

Anyone on this thread posting hateful slurs, politics, religion, or disrespectful comments after this point will also be banned immediately. Not sure if your comment qualifies? Think real hard before hitting that save button.

@chaosesqueteam

I never said your game is trash or the engine is garbage, you just made that up and the point that everything will collabse was not made by me but MarioSMB.

The engine discussion was a generall discussion about the industry and the scene.

A game shouldn't be centered around use of the console for anything, it's an optional thing for advanced users. Of course, a mod may differ from this at the expense of playability...

My intention was to give suggestions, not help design or implement them. However, since you're actually considering it instead of insulting everyone, here's an opinion on how the multi-tool could work:

Secondary fire would open the menu (entirely possible as explained on IRC) to change which building is set, this menu could be off to the side a bit (not sure how this would be done) with a live preview in front of the player (or just those barebones previews normally shown).

Primary would continue to be placement option, though perhaps it should have a "build" delay or something so it doesn't feel instant and cheap/unnatural. One would need to hold in the button while it builds.

I would also suggest moving the buildings into a buffer (like the player model selection menu) and pulling their information from text files, so you don't need to add new ones to the code.

This doesn't really speed things up, but it does greatly clean up a massive code file, and maybe leads to more fancy things in the future (building categories, an easy way for someone to add or remove buildings they want or don't want, etc), minor things that would otherwise take modifying thousands of lines of code.