I always figured her a Samus rather than a Princess Peach. The concept is perhaps a bit too... seductive(?)/"pretty" compared to my internal image. Said image is probably a bit too close to Samus I'll have to admit.
If the tap symbol is trademarked and not copyrighted (I don't know if it is), then your symbol might be close enough to infringe. Anyway, I don't want to be pessimistic, more free card games would be awesome :)
Honestly? A README and possibly a helper script. A "proper" build system will help by reminding the user when they are missing dependencies, but unless you need the flexibility I say RTFM :).
Honestly? A README and possibly a helper script. A "proper" build system will help by reminding the user when they are missing dependencies, but unless you need the flexibility I say RTFM :).
...and will be released under the public-domain (CC0) license.
FOSS does not equal anti-commercial. Can't see how they have "betrayed" anything, although I can sympathize - if not neccessarily agree - with the notion that it's similiar to arguably exploitative "design competitions" like 99-designs.
"She needs to be cute and innocent!"
I always figured her a Samus rather than a Princess Peach. The concept is perhaps a bit too... seductive(?)/"pretty" compared to my internal image. Said image is probably a bit too close to Samus I'll have to admit.
Aosi: You might want to chime in on the freegamer post instead.
pennomi: I think that's all the dependencies, or at least what I installed on a clean Ubuntu install in order to build it.
If the tap symbol is trademarked and not copyrighted (I don't know if it is), then your symbol might be close enough to infringe. Anyway, I don't want to be pessimistic, more free card games would be awesome :)
I believe the tap symbol and/or mechanic is trademarked/copyrighted.
Honestly? A README and possibly a helper script. A "proper" build system will help by reminding the user when they are missing dependencies, but unless you need the flexibility I say RTFM :).
For distribution a .deb would be cool.
Honestly? A README and possibly a helper script. A "proper" build system will help by reminding the user when they are missing dependencies, but unless you need the flexibility I say RTFM :).
For distribution a .deb would be cool.
...and will be released under the public-domain (CC0) license.
FOSS does not equal anti-commercial. Can't see how they have "betrayed" anything, although I can sympathize - if not neccessarily agree - with the notion that it's similiar to arguably exploitative "design competitions" like 99-designs.
Can I keep it, pleeease?
Moved this to the Feedback forum.
Pages