Yes... along with a comment detailing the potential licensing issues like a screenshot of where the art was ripped from or evidence of a different license.
"Script" is a pretty broad term, usually referring to any prepared set of instructions for a computer to perform. You mentioned Maya, so I assume you're specifically looking for Maya scripts? It may be a good idea to specify that explicitly in the title. "Maya Script Idea for..."
Unfortunately I am not familiar with that particular form of scripting, but I'm sure there are others who will be able to help you out. :)
assuming you're talking about ./Graphics/Battlers/071-Bird01.png, I'd say it looks like it's more inspiration that derivation; the proportions are similar but not qutie the same. The poses are a bit close, too, but not what I would call a match.
You should not use any part of that animation. Study it, learn from it, be inspired by it, but don't use it. Make your own animation from scratch or find something comparable here on OGA (all assets here allow derivatives).
Every scenario you describe would make your creation a derivative of the original. Taking any part of another asset and changing it or using it as a base or guide is considered deriving art.
That isn't necessarily bad. Some assets are licensed to allow people to make derivatives as long as you give credit to the original artist. So the question is "what is that asset licensed under?"
If it's from a commercial game, in all likelihood derivatives are NOT allowed. Where is that animation from? Who owns the copyright?
The BipCot NoGov is not a license accepted on OpenGameArt. Would you be willing to go with the license you submitted it under instead? (CC-BY 3.0) Or indicate it is dual licensed with CC-BY 3.0 in the Copyright/Attribution instructions?
Those collections may continue to experience this issue because submissions with licensing issues continue to be added to them. Licensing issues are periodically removed from the archive when it is determined no legal solution will be forthcoming. This results in your collections containing references to removed content. I recommend avoiding the addition of assets marked with a licensing issue. When I can, I'll pre-emptively remove references in your collections before unpublishing the asset.
Yes... along with a comment detailing the potential licensing issues like a screenshot of where the art was ripped from or evidence of a different license.
Welcome! :)
"Script" is a pretty broad term, usually referring to any prepared set of instructions for a computer to perform. You mentioned Maya, so I assume you're specifically looking for Maya scripts? It may be a good idea to specify that explicitly in the title. "Maya Script Idea for..."
Unfortunately I am not familiar with that particular form of scripting, but I'm sure there are others who will be able to help you out. :)
assuming you're talking about ./Graphics/Battlers/071-Bird01.png, I'd say it looks like it's more inspiration that derivation; the proportions are similar but not qutie the same. The poses are a bit close, too, but not what I would call a match.
Good eye, Kir. Thanks for pointing that out.
You should not use any part of that animation. Study it, learn from it, be inspired by it, but don't use it. Make your own animation from scratch or find something comparable here on OGA (all assets here allow derivatives).
Every scenario you describe would make your creation a derivative of the original. Taking any part of another asset and changing it or using it as a base or guide is considered deriving art.
That isn't necessarily bad. Some assets are licensed to allow people to make derivatives as long as you give credit to the original artist. So the question is "what is that asset licensed under?"
If it's from a commercial game, in all likelihood derivatives are NOT allowed. Where is that animation from? Who owns the copyright?
nope. sounds good. Thanks.
The votes are in! Congratulations, Joth! Winning submission: https://opengameart.org/content/the-9th-circle
Thanks to all participants. Medals have been awarded.
Good stuff, guys. Keep it up! :)
The BipCot NoGov is not a license accepted on OpenGameArt. Would you be willing to go with the license you submitted it under instead? (CC-BY 3.0) Or indicate it is dual licensed with CC-BY 3.0 in the Copyright/Attribution instructions?
Those collections may continue to experience this issue because submissions with licensing issues continue to be added to them. Licensing issues are periodically removed from the archive when it is determined no legal solution will be forthcoming. This results in your collections containing references to removed content. I recommend avoiding the addition of assets marked with a licensing issue. When I can, I'll pre-emptively remove references in your collections before unpublishing the asset.
Fixed?
Pages