well spam or bashing ... but as I don't see any of those both problem at the moment (and don't think there will any soon), I think a mandatory Nick field is completely enough at the moment.
Constructive criticism definitely should be encouraged... but I don't think allowing to post anonymously can help there, as people should stand behind their criticism (if that is really a constructive one) and also help the artists to make it better in some cases by being responsive. I also don't think rating stuff bad is a good idea, but that s another topic
well, you only will get this egoboosting if you re good. Bad pieces just would not get any comments (which also should let you think about your art and how to make it better).
Also I actually think that DA is a pretty good example of how to create a bad community.
I don't actually think that art should be reviewed by people who don't like it. I think that uploaders who dared to make or upload stuff to OGA shouldn't be punished for it. We have moderation system and also a favorites system that can push good work on the front. Also art that for one user might look worthless, could be very handy for the other one. I know that I have a bit different view on the topic, but it helps to keep a good community, keep tensions out and also motivates people to upload their stuff without worrying what other might have to say bad about their work.
great, thank you :) ... the admin sidepanels looks even more messed up now :P
IMO that much better now though
edit: I really don't care how the side bar looks like... just wanted to annoy a lite...xD
Another great one, thanks
I already saw some of your works and while your quality is always amazing, your creativity never seems to run dry. Great art :)
The main problem to me is the confusement with absolut anonymity, and having a mandatory nick field would help there a lot IMO.
In how far was that madatory indentity field used by spammers?
well spam or bashing ... but as I don't see any of those both problem at the moment (and don't think there will any soon), I think a mandatory Nick field is completely enough at the moment.
Yeah, I think I know what you mean...
Constructive criticism definitely should be encouraged... but I don't think allowing to post anonymously can help there, as people should stand behind their criticism (if that is really a constructive one) and also help the artists to make it better in some cases by being responsive. I also don't think rating stuff bad is a good idea, but that s another topic
great!
just like I wanted it :D
well, you only will get this egoboosting if you re good. Bad pieces just would not get any comments (which also should let you think about your art and how to make it better).
Also I actually think that DA is a pretty good example of how to create a bad community.
Well it is actually supposed to sound some kind of chaotic (more of disorganized, like you expect sounds to happen... as they don't follow patterns)
So is it still too active for you or not?
I don't actually think that art should be reviewed by people who don't like it. I think that uploaders who dared to make or upload stuff to OGA shouldn't be punished for it. We have moderation system and also a favorites system that can push good work on the front. Also art that for one user might look worthless, could be very handy for the other one. I know that I have a bit different view on the topic, but it helps to keep a good community, keep tensions out and also motivates people to upload their stuff without worrying what other might have to say bad about their work.
Pages