Primary tabs

Comments by User

Monday, January 9, 2012 - 07:08

Love it. Agree with Bart's nitpicks, but other than that, this is incredible!

Wednesday, January 4, 2012 - 19:29

Really liking the characters you come up with!

Critique: The highlight on his nose is too similar to his mouth, and I feel the shading could be a bit more defined (more highlights/shaded areas) on this one.

Good work. Keep them coming please! :)

Sunday, December 18, 2011 - 14:37

Hi Retimer, sorry for bothering you with all this license stuff. It sure is boring compared to making art, but we can't afford to slack of in this area. Do you want the same license for all your submissions? I see you used a different set for some other pieces.

If you use CC-BY you can mandate the attribution. If you use CC0, people are allowed to use it however they want (you can still make requests, but they don't have to do what you want). Using multiple licenses means users get to choose between them.

Here are links to human readable summaries for CC0 and CC-BY, respectively:

I know the submission form can be a bit daunting. Do you have any suggestions on improvements?

Sunday, December 18, 2011 - 10:08

Hi Retimer, thank you for your submissions! The choice of licenses for this is a bit strange, however - public domain/CC0 would effectively allow people to use any license they want, so adding GPL to that is a bit confusing. Would you mind clarifying under what conditions you want to allow the use of these?

Saturday, December 17, 2011 - 10:55

I see what you mean. And it's possible to update a submission, so you can add stuff as you make it. I think the real issue is that we've never really (officially) decided on how large submissions should be. On the one hand, if you're looking for a placeholder and don't care if it "fits" it can be useful to have individual pieces show up. On the other, you don't want to wade through pieces that don't interest you.

On the fairness issue, that's harder. For example, grouping all parts of into one pack might be better - they are very uniform. But that would only give one "point" for something quite huge. It may be better - if more contentious - to award medals based on appreciation.

There's also some overlap with art collections, eg. .

I think we'll have to get better at this. Browsing can already be a bit messy, and it'll only get worse as we grow...

Welcome to OGA! :)

Thursday, December 15, 2011 - 06:47

Nice work on these, Charles :)


qubodup: You need to add a leading / or it will add a redundant content/ anyway. (/content/name, not content/name).

Wednesday, December 14, 2011 - 08:29

D-Cire: you'll need

Saturday, December 3, 2011 - 11:40

You may want to do a search for Radakan. I think at least "Old Crypt" might fit.

Friday, December 2, 2011 - 17:50

This is incredible. Thanks for contributing!

Monday, November 28, 2011 - 19:19

I wouldn't notice any difference. I don't really use left-click on the web anymore.

bart: You can rename it you know ;)