If I got it right, it says the derived work can be released under cc0 but you should still properly credit the original author (thus it is not really cc0 anymore). So it is not recommended
You can probably ask the author for an exception clause like that kirita brush pack's license
Also from what I understand they are derived from the free zbrush brush pack by Michael Vicente aka ORB. But then stkopp somehow relicensed the derivative work under CC-BY
They are all CC-0 with Anonymous as their author field. You should be well aware of the implications of the CC-0 license before posting anything under it. Calling people thieves after that is pointless
Even if they are deleted someone can reupload (but of course that would not be very polite)
Also a website is a service, administration can deny your access anytime they want. Don't forget that there are websites which would ban even their paid customers.
If you click an image it generally has a link to a blog entry which has a reference to the original work. Then you can get the original image. (I don't advise getting the images directly from the flickr site, as they might have been edited. Also some of them are not even public domain)
Download on your site was slow for me. You may host the files on itch. It might even give you a larger audience and CC.
50 hues of oga gamejam summer
https://pixabay.com/forum/official-pixabay-news-2/the-pixabay-license-78...
TL;DR: all images prior to the new license are indeed cc0, good luck finding which
(posting images just incase they delete them too, but you can probably use wayback machine)
https://creativecommons.org/faq/#if-i-derive-or-adapt-material-offered-u...
If I got it right, it says the derived work can be released under cc0 but you should still properly credit the original author (thus it is not really cc0 anymore). So it is not recommended
You can probably ask the author for an exception clause like that kirita brush pack's license
Also from what I understand they are derived from the free zbrush brush pack by Michael Vicente aka ORB. But then stkopp somehow relicensed the derivative work under CC-BY
They are all CC-0 with Anonymous as their author field. You should be well aware of the implications of the CC-0 license before posting anything under it. Calling people thieves after that is pointless
Even if they are deleted someone can reupload (but of course that would not be very polite)
Also a website is a service, administration can deny your access anytime they want. Don't forget that there are websites which would ban even their paid customers.
I think you posted the wrong link. It is a comic site. There is no music on it.You can probably use love2d or godot.
https://opengameart.org/node/83169
good idea
This can be used as an entry point:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bibliodyssey/page1
If you click an image it generally has a link to a blog entry which has a reference to the original work. Then you can get the original image. (I don't advise getting the images directly from the flickr site, as they might have been edited. Also some of them are not even public domain)
Pages