Primary tabs

Comments by User

Saturday, June 2, 2012 - 07:25

@qubodup: This means that cc-by-sa licensed game assets cannot contain cc-by or cc-0 because cc-by-sa would force other assets to be cc-by-sa as well. There should be license compatibility list or something. There are some lists for software, but as I am not an artist I do not know resources for this domain.

Friday, June 1, 2012 - 16:58

CC0 can be relicensed as you see fit. From the text of CC-By it seems it can be relicensed as well (at least a derivative work does not need to have the same license). I am not a lawyer though.

Friday, June 1, 2012 - 13:08

Including cc-0 when cc-by is searched seems like a good idea.

Tuesday, May 29, 2012 - 02:59

@Scribe: CC0 is no longer there. Dont know why

Thursday, May 24, 2012 - 01:55

wow, i hope to see this technique in the lpc.

Wednesday, May 23, 2012 - 11:31

@qubodup: yes you are right about being broad, but we can decide on something specific. Something like benefits of coffee ;)... just kidding. Bu we can decide on something.

Tuesday, May 22, 2012 - 00:28

Aducational as in educating a group of people. It can be kids and the topic could be numbers, objects or it can target adults and educate people about free software, parenting, etc... We can select a specific target or just an audiance for a challenge.

Monday, May 21, 2012 - 14:26

It would be nice to have new challenges. How about an educational challenge?

Monday, May 21, 2012 - 14:24

CC0 is the best choise in your case. LGPL applies to software and I am not sure if it correctly applies to art.

Monday, May 14, 2012 - 14:05

@anonymous: according to the license you have to publish your modifications with the same license. however, author might allow you to use the model with cc-by terms, which is exactly what you propose.

Pages