I would say, in this case, "Adobe says" is actually sufficient. They are publicly asserting (which makes them legally liable) that all assets used to train Firefly are correctly licensed/attributed already or they posess all relevant rights.
"Note: Submissions will be unaffected by any such removal if the art therein was generated with technologies who's training dataset, in its entirety, is demonstrably openly licensed."
Done.
Oh, dang. I totally missed that. Yeah, unless Firefly has a non-non-commercial option, that won't do.
I'm open to hearing arguments to the contrary, but barring that, yeah. :)EDIT: missed the fact that Firefly output is (currently) non-commercial only. Until that changes, we can't host Firefly-generated assets.
I would say, in this case, "Adobe says" is actually sufficient. They are publicly asserting (which makes them legally liable) that all assets used to train Firefly are correctly licensed/attributed already or they posess all relevant rights.
Let me know if you had something more specific in mind. I'm happy to change it again if you want.
You got it! :)
Are you simplebuff, LSH?
^^Agreed. Thus the "demonstrably". Links to Adobe Firefly dataset information?
This was already addressed from the beginning: https://opengameart.org/content/artificial-intelligence-assisted-artwork
Of course! :)
Try it out:
Pages