Agreed. In fact, we have just now officially archived this forum in leu of the discussions on the FLARE github repository. You will not be able to reply to any topics in this forum as of today. Please PM me if you have any questions.
I notified you as soon as I knew about it. Alternatively you could upload textures together on one submission and let the texture scan system do its thing to categorize them.
Those are good suggestions for site improvements, though. I'll add them to the list.
I don't want to be that annoying person badgering everyone when they fail to provide attribution or do so incorrectly,
I used to feel this way, not wanting to make my attribution requirements so annoying that people wouldn't want to use my assets. Here's the thing, though; the kind of people who feel it is too inconvenient to give you the credt- but isn't at all inconvenient to use your freeassets- are not the kind of people you should want using your assets anyway. You aren't losing revenue if they get huffy and refuse to use your assets. Conversely, you aren't gaining any reputation or exposure when such people use your assets but don't credit you.
@authors: You deserve credit for your work. You may choose to waive the credit requirement, but even that decision doesn't mean you no longer deserve the credit.
It comes back, yes. In time for what, though?
Agreed. In fact, we have just now officially archived this forum in leu of the discussions on the FLARE github repository. You will not be able to reply to any topics in this forum as of today. Please PM me if you have any questions.
That would certainly answer the copyright questions, but kitbashing isn't really what the GANs are doing.
Indeed it should be. Anyone have the time, skill, and inclination to make that adjustment to this ol' junk heap site?
I notified you as soon as I knew about it. Alternatively you could upload textures together on one submission and let the texture scan system do its thing to categorize them.
Those are good suggestions for site improvements, though. I'll add them to the list.
Hehehe. I wonder if this very thread has become a component of ChatGPT's training set. Or the Collection discussion that Emcee Flesher mentioned: https://opengameart.org/content/artificial-intelligence-assisted-artwork
Woo! Done.
You mean like this?
https://opengameart.org/content/surts-cc0-scraps-tilesets-platformers-sp...
done.
I used to feel this way, not wanting to make my attribution requirements so annoying that people wouldn't want to use my assets. Here's the thing, though; the kind of people who feel it is too inconvenient to give you the credt- but isn't at all inconvenient to use your free assets- are not the kind of people you should want using your assets anyway. You aren't losing revenue if they get huffy and refuse to use your assets. Conversely, you aren't gaining any reputation or exposure when such people use your assets but don't credit you.
@authors: You deserve credit for your work. You may choose to waive the credit requirement, but even that decision doesn't mean you no longer deserve the credit.
Pages