The artists shows it to the manager. The manager says "It looks great, just get rid off that princess". The artist, in disblief, asks for confirmation "Are you sure it is the princess and not the bird?". The manager says "Get rid off that ugly princess". He silently goes back to his desk starts boxing his stuff.
second? make it third
pretty slick
p.s. perhaps you cannot use g+ icon for anything other than google+
Why can't I choose a simple license that just enforces crediting the original author. For example MIT, zlib, BSD. Instead of pages of legalese.
He also made this one and released as public domain http://7soul1.deviantart.com/art/Small-Icons-Arena-138352710
A word of warning though; most of artists think that public domain means something like OGA/CC BY
This is a very detailed work. It seems to be a tedious job as far as I can tell from the video. It definitely paid off.
Your tags don't seem to be comma separated:
you might want to fix your tags
It is highly unlikely he is the author of these textures. He is acting suspicious.
I reported all his posts as well as his account.(unflagged all)Sorry. I guess no one expected this amount of quality content uploaded under CC0 without a single word from the uploader/author.
The artists shows it to the manager. The manager says "It looks great, just get rid off that princess". The artist, in disblief, asks for confirmation "Are you sure it is the princess and not the bird?". The manager says "Get rid off that ugly princess". He silently goes back to his desk starts boxing his stuff.
Pages