One more thing that bugs me: If I click on the thread links under "Active Forum Topics" I'm taken to the first page of the thread, rather than the most recent post.
None of this was meant to be anything but rough concepts, hence the inclusion of the background pattern. If people did want to use them as is in-game (really, they shouldn't) then I could upload the OpenRaster files for full resolution and allow removal of the background patterns, though they are pretty hefty size-wise.
Started a simple zombie/ghoul type thing but lost motivation (8 frame walk cycle, WTF), so likely won't finish it. Here it is in case anyone wants to take it over.
The feedback I think would be better handled with a popup say that a license is redundant.
The searching I very much agree with, though perhaps have an "include compatible licenses" option that defaults to on as people might still want to find something with a specific license.
I allways imagined that this might be the case with searching (though have always been too lazy to test it) so license my stuff both as GPL2+ and GPL3+ even though I feel kind of stupid doing so.
You may request, but whether or not I will be sufficiently interested or sufficiently motivated to satisfy such a request is entirely up to the Fates.
One more thing that bugs me: If I click on the thread links under "Active Forum Topics" I'm taken to the first page of the thread, rather than the most recent post.
None of this was meant to be anything but rough concepts, hence the inclusion of the background pattern. If people did want to use them as is in-game (really, they shouldn't) then I could upload the OpenRaster files for full resolution and allow removal of the background patterns, though they are pretty hefty size-wise.
Started a simple zombie/ghoul type thing but lost motivation (8 frame walk cycle, WTF), so likely won't finish it. Here it is in case anyone wants to take it over.
More scraps:
The feedback I think would be better handled with a popup say that a license is redundant.
The searching I very much agree with, though perhaps have an "include compatible licenses" option that defaults to on as people might still want to find something with a specific license.
I allways imagined that this might be the case with searching (though have always been too lazy to test it) so license my stuff both as GPL2+ and GPL3+ even though I feel kind of stupid doing so.
Pages