Yep. These are all back now, but it looks like they were extra suspicious because of the dollar amount, emojis, and links. All those are fine and you can keep using them, they just look a lot like spam to the anti spam system.
I think you're the only one that can see that image since it's linked from your Gmail inbox. You'll need to upload the image via the "add a new file" field.
Uploading multiple submissions in quick succession can trigger the site doing that. This gives administrators a chance to check the submissions to make sure they aren't spam. It also allows other uploaders some decent time on the "front page", the top of new submissions list. Otherwise, by uploading so many submission in a short amount of time, it pushes other people down and their one submission is ignored in light of your twelve.
Thank you for sharing. It is clear your submissions are not spam, but it's also clear why the anti-spam system thought they might be.
I will be slowly un-hiding your submissions (except the duplicates). Please do NOT re-upload more copies. Also, your tags need fixing as well. Your submissions each have one giant tag, instead of several descriptive individual ones.
P.S. Alternatively, you can avoid the site panicking about submissions by submitting multiple related assets together in one submission instead of multiple submissions containing one asset each. It is fine either way. :)
If you are the person taking the pictures of the objects, you would own the copyright to the image. You could license the images however you wanted. There are a few exceptions to this, where you being the photographer would not make the images legally safe:
A person's likeness - basically, if there are people in the image and they are recognizable, you do not own the rights to their likeness. This is especially true for celebrities, since so many people could recognize their face and their likeness is what they get paid for.
Trademarks - taking pictures of the giant Coca-Cola sign in Times Square subjects your picture to Coca-Cola's trademark. Similarly, taking a screenshot of The Legend Of Zelda gameplay doesn't allow you to share the screenshot under whatever license you want since the characters displayed in that screenshot are trademarked by Nintendo. Could you use the screenshot under Fair-Use? Sure! But you couldn't share it under a specific license of your choosing.
Restricted locations - Laws differ on this from country to country, but in the US, it is illegal to take pictures of prisons, high-security military installations, etc. Disseminating such photographs would likewise be disallowed.
Yep. These are all back now, but it looks like they were extra suspicious because of the dollar amount, emojis, and links. All those are fine and you can keep using them, they just look a lot like spam to the anti spam system.
Here it is: https://opengameart.org/content/objects-for-16x16-tilesets
I think you're the only one that can see that image since it's linked from your Gmail inbox. You'll need to upload the image via the "add a new file" field.
Uploading multiple submissions in quick succession can trigger the site doing that. This gives administrators a chance to check the submissions to make sure they aren't spam. It also allows other uploaders some decent time on the "front page", the top of new submissions list. Otherwise, by uploading so many submission in a short amount of time, it pushes other people down and their one submission is ignored in light of your twelve.
Thank you for sharing. It is clear your submissions are not spam, but it's also clear why the anti-spam system thought they might be.
I will be slowly un-hiding your submissions (except the duplicates). Please do NOT re-upload more copies. Also, your tags need fixing as well. Your submissions each have one giant tag, instead of several descriptive individual ones.
P.S. Alternatively, you can avoid the site panicking about submissions by submitting multiple related assets together in one submission instead of multiple submissions containing one asset each. It is fine either way. :)
The links don't match the format required. Not sure the format allows a start time, either. Check what I changed the first one to.
On 9/25/2022, Nila122 gave permisison to use OGA-BY for their LPC content. The license has been added to this submission.
On 9/25/2022, Nila122 gave permisison to use OGA-BY for their LPC content. The license has been added to this submission.
On 9/25/2022, Nila122 gave permisison to use OGA-BY for their LPC content. The license has been added to this submission.
On 9/25/2022, Nila122 gave permisison to use OGA-BY for their LPC content. The license has been added to this submission.
If you are the person taking the pictures of the objects, you would own the copyright to the image. You could license the images however you wanted. There are a few exceptions to this, where you being the photographer would not make the images legally safe:
I hope that helps. :)
Pages