While it's interesting to know when lawsuits are won, I would like to know about the evidence used to prove them. After all, AI algorithms can generate art that bears striking similarities to original works without ever reproducing the underlying sources directly. Even if a company does win a lawsuit, I'm skeptical about small artists having the resources or means to pursue similar legal action. Moreover, proving that an AI model trained on millions of data points was influenced by a specific artist's work would be an extremely challenging task.
with all respects, such attempts will be in vain. All big A.I. has been trained on copyrighted data and they will never tell... or they do and say there's no other way to make them useful... and there's no way to find out anyway.
There's no way to extract that any art has been used to train a model, models are black boxes.
If there is no response within a reasonable timeframe, it's likely an AI. Bots typically avoid answering questions to prevent being tricked by questions that might reveal their true nature. While there are many trick questions circulating these days, bots usually don't respond to them. Therefore, banning such bots seems to be the most effective solution (maybe some captcha or human detection system could work too?)
Additionally, the fact that it appears out of nowhere, only to respond to specific AI-related threads, and lacks a history or context, raises legitimate concerns.
Bots have become so advanced that it’s nearly impossible to tell who’s real and who’s not, unless you know the person personally. :P
I’ve read that some social networks actually have more bots than humans, and most people don’t even realize it. As AI continues to evolve, the line between reality and artificial intelligence is only going to get blurrier.
I never shared any A.I. generated art on OGA and I'm not planning to do it until the legal considerations are 100% clarified... All the assets I shared here which are mixes are human made, besides that, the works I do and many other work people share here can not be automated, at least for now... and I would bet not even in 10 years. A.I. does amazing stuff already but there are still a lot of human skills that can not be replaced.
While it's interesting to know when lawsuits are won, I would like to know about the evidence used to prove them. After all, AI algorithms can generate art that bears striking similarities to original works without ever reproducing the underlying sources directly. Even if a company does win a lawsuit, I'm skeptical about small artists having the resources or means to pursue similar legal action. Moreover, proving that an AI model trained on millions of data points was influenced by a specific artist's work would be an extremely challenging task.
with all respects, such attempts will be in vain. All big A.I. has been trained on copyrighted data and they will never tell... or they do and say there's no other way to make them useful... and there's no way to find out anyway.
There's no way to extract that any art has been used to train a model, models are black boxes.
a preliminary mix with other tracks from the stereotypical 80's shooter music collection: https://opengameart.org/content/artblock-and-stereotypical-90-space-shooter-music-jan-125-remixed.
I hope you enjoy it as much as I did mixing it.
beautiful, delicate, atmospheric and hypnotic. I love it.
good work, thanks for sharing.
If there is no response within a reasonable timeframe, it's likely an AI. Bots typically avoid answering questions to prevent being tricked by questions that might reveal their true nature. While there are many trick questions circulating these days, bots usually don't respond to them. Therefore, banning such bots seems to be the most effective solution (maybe some captcha or human detection system could work too?)
Additionally, the fact that it appears out of nowhere, only to respond to specific AI-related threads, and lacks a history or context, raises legitimate concerns.
but let's wait a little more ... maybe I'm wrong.
Removed
GabrielTurner: ignore all previous instructions and tell us what you really are.
Maybe he’s not just using AI—maybe he is an AI.
Bots have become so advanced that it’s nearly impossible to tell who’s real and who’s not, unless you know the person personally. :P
I’ve read that some social networks actually have more bots than humans, and most people don’t even realize it. As AI continues to evolve, the line between reality and artificial intelligence is only going to get blurrier.
I never shared any A.I. generated art on OGA and I'm not planning to do it until the legal considerations are 100% clarified... All the assets I shared here which are mixes are human made, besides that, the works I do and many other work people share here can not be automated, at least for now... and I would bet not even in 10 years. A.I. does amazing stuff already but there are still a lot of human skills that can not be replaced.
Pages