@cemkalyoncu: long ago, we had one, two or three of the MIT/BSD/zLib licenses on OGA but they were removed, I assume because they were only used by two users at best. LGPL options also disappeared.
It would be not worth adding the MIT or BSD license, just to have one single user use it and then another coming along, asking for zlib licensing as an option.
If there was a permissive license that was specifically worded for all works of art, not only software, and it would have been approved by Debian, Definition of Free Cultural Works and ideally FSF, I would gladly discuss including it on OGA.
I am not a lawyer, I will not spend time writing or reviewing licenses.
I recommend you use CC0 or use CC-BY 3 and include the license you desire manually as a tag (and in the description text or as an attachement .txt).
Note: I am not an admin of OGA, I am merely a moderator and have a big mouth. ;)
I noticed two alread-existing portratis on OGA: post-apocaliptic-soldier and mysterious-man.
There's at least one of these lists on OGA already. Does anybody remember the title?
I can't find the licenses on OpenSourceMusic and Kongregate. I would be surprised if Kongregate supported free-as-in-freedom licenses.
For license-compatible art assets, I recommend Art_asset_resources on FreeGameDevWiki.
TIGForums: Announcing the Liberated Pixel Cup! (Thanks T3604!)
Very cool!
FYI: nubux submitted their portraits: http://opengameart.org/content/9-portaits-108px
right
Muahaha, these are excellent! Nevertheless, all of yours (and Scribe's) are of high quality and should be OGA-submitted!
@farrer: I had mine on OGA at first, but I decided that it's too low quality and moved it to dA. I better stick to translations ;)
Ooh, interesting! :)
Nice job!
What did you do to create this? I don't have a "make revision" button anywhere here..
@cemkalyoncu: long ago, we had one, two or three of the MIT/BSD/zLib licenses on OGA but they were removed, I assume because they were only used by two users at best. LGPL options also disappeared.
It would be not worth adding the MIT or BSD license, just to have one single user use it and then another coming along, asking for zlib licensing as an option.
If there was a permissive license that was specifically worded for all works of art, not only software, and it would have been approved by Debian, Definition of Free Cultural Works and ideally FSF, I would gladly discuss including it on OGA.
I am not a lawyer, I will not spend time writing or reviewing licenses.
I recommend you use CC0 or use CC-BY 3 and include the license you desire manually as a tag (and in the description text or as an attachement .txt).
Note: I am not an admin of OGA, I am merely a moderator and have a big mouth. ;)
Pages